Central manufacturing IT programmes have a consistent failure pattern: a standard MES or data platform is designed, rollout begins, and each plant negotiates enough local variation that the standard stops being one. Five years later there are eleven implementations of the standard system.
This is not obstruction. Plant managers are measured on output, quality and safety, and a central programme that threatens any of those is a risk they are accountable for and the programme team is not. Any approach that does not account for that asymmetry will fail regardless of its technical merit.